Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2001 » C6-00-1870, C2-00-1963, David E. Mollico, Respondent, vs. Evelyn L. Mollico, Respondent (C6-00-1870), Scott Lucia, Respondent (C6-00-1870), Appellant (C2-00-1963), Peggy A. Nelson, f/k/a Peggy A. Sche
C6-00-1870, C2-00-1963, David E. Mollico, Respondent, vs. Evelyn L. Mollico, Respondent (C6-00-1870), Scott Lucia, Respondent (C6-00-1870), Appellant (C2-00-1963), Peggy A. Nelson, f/k/a Peggy A. Sche
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: C6-00-1870, C2-00-1963
Case Date: 06/26/2001

STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN COURT OF APPEALS

C6-00-1870
C2-00-1963

 David E. Mollico,
Respondent,
 

vs. 

Evelyn L. Mollico,
Respondent (C6-00-1870), 

Scott Lucia,
Respondent (C6-00-1870),
Appellant (C2-00-1963), 

Peggy A. Nelson, f/k/a Peggy A. Scheall, et al., Defendants, 

Phyllis R. Bazso, a/k/a Phyllis L. Bazso,
Respondent (C6-00-1870), 

and 

Evelyn Mollico, third-party plaintiff,
Respondent (C6-00-1870),

 vs. 

Richard D. Kolu, third-party defendant,
Appellant (C6-00-1870).

 

Filed June 19, 2001
Affirmed

Crippen, Judge
 

St. Louis County District Court
File No. CX98602481
 

Harold A. Frederick, Joseph M. Fischer, Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A., 700 Lonsdale Building, 302 West Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55802 (for respondent David Mollico) 

Larry Stauber, Jr., Stauber & Lien, 1011 Central Entrance, Duluth, MN 55811 (for respondent Evelyn Mollico) 

Richard A. Nelson, P.O. Box 7143, Duluth, MN 55807 (for respondent Lucia) 

Jeffrey C. Paulson, Hammargren, Meyer & Paulson, P.A., Suite 360, 7301 Ohms Lane, Minneapolis, MN 55439 (for appellant Lucia) 

Phyllis R. Bazso, 1120 Pepper Drive, Space Six, El Cagon, CA 92021 (pro se respondent) 

Michael E. Orman, Orman & Nord Law Offices, 1301 Miller Trunk Highway, Suite 400, Duluth, MN 55811 (for third-party plaintiff/respondent Evelyn Mollico) 

John D. Kelly, Robin C. Merritt, Hanft Fride, P.A., 1000 U.S. Bank Place, 130 West Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55802-2094 (for appellant Kolu) 

            Considered and decided by Hanson, Presiding Judge, Toussaint, Chief Judge, and Crippen, Judge.

S Y L L A B U S

Extrinsic parol evidence of the intent of the landowners to retain the right to revoke delivery of a deed may not be admitted to contradict an unambiguous conveyance.

O P I N I O N

CRIPPEN, Judge

Appellants Richard Kolu and Scott Lucia challenge the trial court

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips