Preview:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 96-KP-00266-SCT THOMAS COX v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: TRIAL JUDGE: COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: 02/26/96 HON. JOHN M. MONTGOMERY CLAY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT PRO SE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: SCOTT STUART FORREST ALLGOOD CRIMINAL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF REVERSED AND REMANDED - 09/11/97 10/2/97

DISTRICT ATTORNEY: NATURE OF THE CASE: DISPOSITION: MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE SULLIVAN, P.J., PITTMAN AND BANKS, JJ. SULLIVAN, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

On October 5, 1994, Thomas Cox plead guilty to possession of cocaine as a habitual offender in Clay County Circuit Court. He was sentenced to three years in prison without the possibility of parole and fined a $1,000.00. The trial judge noted that on a previous day and in another term of court, Cox had entered a plea of not guilty to a charge of the sale of cocaine as a habitual offender in cause number 6860. The State agreed to reduce the charges to possession of a controlled substance as a habitual offender. The court agreed to the State's request to "retire to the files" another charge for sale of cocaine in cause number 6871 pursuant to the plea agreement. The State explained that Cox is possibly suffering from AIDS and was going to testify for the State in a murder prosecution which had been disposed. Cox plead guilty to the sale of a controlled substance as a habitual offender. The trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to Uniform Circuit Court Rules of Civil Procedure

8.04.(1) The trial judge determined that Cox completed the ninth grade and can read and write a little bit. Cox stated that he had reviewed the petition with his lawyer and understood everything in the petition. The petition to plead guilty is not in this record. Cox was advised of the minimum and maximum sentences. Cox acknowledges that if he was found guilty as a habitual offender he would receive three years in prison without eligibility for early release and a one thousand-dollar fine. The trial judge determined that Cox's plea was freely, voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered with a factual basis to support the charge. The trial court then held a hearing on Cox's habitual offender status pursuant to U.C.C.C.R. 11.03.(2) The trial court stated that Cox was convicted in Clay County, cause number 6271, for two counts of grand larceny, a felony, on October 4, 1988, for both counts. Cox was sentenced to serve three years for each count to run consecutively. The trial court stated that the records accurately stated the indictments. However, the court was not convinced that the prior charges were separately brought and arose out of separate instances at different times. The State stipulated in the record that in cause number 6271, count I, Cox entered a plea of guilty to theft of a Speed air, one horse power portable air compressor which occurred on January 9, 1988. In count II, Cox stole a blue three inch Thompson pump (Thrash pump) which occurred on January 2, 1988. There were two separate sentencing orders entered on each count. Cox's attorney agreed to stipulate the prior offenses. However, when asked if he agreed with his attorney to stipulate the prior offenses into record, Cox stated that he did not understand. In fact, Cox disagreed with the State and stated that the two thefts occurred on the same night. Furthermore, Cox stated that he did not understand why the prior convictions in 1988 pertained to his 1994 plea hearing and sentencing. The State moved the trial judge to take judicial notice of the record and the court file in cause number 6271 and asked the court for leave to substitute certified copies at the conclusion of the hearing. Cox's attorney did not object. The trial court directed the State to make certified copies of cause number 6271 of the prior convictions as part of the record. The trial court determined that in cause number 6271, count I was a prior conviction which occurred on January 9, 1988, and count II prior conviction occurred on January 2, 1988, and that these two charges were brought out of two separate instances with different owners with a sentence of at least one year each in the penal institution. The trial court concluded that the prior convictions fulfilled the habitual offender statute requirement. Cox admitted he was the same person who was convicted of the two 1988 grand larceny charges. The trial court sentenced Cox to three years with the Mississippi Department of Corrections as a habitual offender pursuant to Miss. Code Ann.

Download Thomas Cox vs. State of MS.pdf

Mississippi Law