Preview:

No. 89-052
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
1989

IN THE MATTER OF B.J., a Youth Under the Age of Eighteen.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Twentieth Judicial ~istrict, In and for the County of Lake, The Honorable C. B. Judge presiding.
~c~eil,
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For Appellant:
Timothy J. Lape, Polson, Montana
For Respondent:
Hon. Marc ~acicot, Attorney General, Helena, Montana Paul D. Johnson, Asst. Atty. General, Helena Larry Nistler, County Attorney; Robert Anderson, Deputy, Polson, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: July 20, 1989
C- Decided: October 17, 1989
cr

0 e
Filed-20
-IULrl
= gE
(U" = -&-rC
-f --Q
i; r; ,,L'z,
Justice William E. Hunt, Sr. delivered the opinion of the
Court.

B.J., a youth under the age of eighteen, appeals from the transfer of jurisdiction over his robbery charge under 5 45-5-401 (1) (b) , MCA, and his felony assault charge under S 45-5-202 (2) (b) , MCA, from Youth Court to the District Court of the Twentieth Judicial District, Lake County, pursuant to 5 41-5-206, MCA. We affirm.
The issue raised on appeal is whether substantial credible evidence supported the District Court's order transferring jurisdiction from Youth Court to District Court. On December 6, 1988, B.J. and two accomplices were alleged to have robbed the Holt family at gunpoint in violation of 5 45-5-202(2) (b), MCA, and S 45-5-401(1) (b), MCA. Youth Court petitions were filed on December 7, 1988, and January 4, 1989, which charged B.J. with the offenses. Also on January 4, 1989, the State filed a motion to transfer
the cause to District Court under 5 41-5-206, MCA. A hearing on the motion was held on January 23, 1989. ~estimony and evidence detailing the events of December 6, 1988, were presented at the hearing.
Holt, the robbery and assault victim, testified that on
December 6, 1988, three men approached his home by driving a
vehicle up his driveway, across his lawn, and up to his back

door. Holt testified that his home was without lights due to
a power outage that evening. Holt walked out of his home to
investigate and was greeted by a man, he later identified as
B.J., who placed a shotgun to Holt's head. Holt then
testified that he inquired as to the seriousness of the
situation to which B.J. replied, "God damn serious," and that
they were going to kill Holt.

The three men then ordered Holt to tell his wife to open
the door to the Holt residence or they would kill her. The
Holts' two young children were also in the home. The men
entered the darkened home, tore the telephone off the wall
and demanded "drugs, money, and the keys to your car." Holt
testified that he gave the men his wallet, told them that he
did not have any drugs, and told them that the keys to his
car were in the ignition. Holt started his car for the three
men, who drove off in it leaving their original vehicle
behind. Holt stated that during the entire ordeal, he was
held at gunpoint and repeatedly threatened with his life.

Sheriff's detective Michael Walrod testified at the
hearing that he arrived at the Holt residence at
approximately 12:30 a.m. shortly after the three men
departed. He ran a check on the vehicle abandoned by the
threesome and discovered that it was registered to B.J.'s
mother. A sheath knife and a club was found therein.

Sanders County Sheriff Bill Alexander testified that on
December 7, 1988, he stopped the stolen Holt vehicle after
receiving a dispatch report of an armed robbery. He then
arrested the occupants. A search of the vehicle revealed a
military sheath knife, a sheath knife, 20 gauge shotgun
shells, a .22 caliber pistol, and a shotgun. The weapons
found in the vehicle were introduced as the State's exhibits
during the transfer hearing.

The chief juvenile probation officer for Lake County,
David McDougall, testified as to his current file on B. J.,
stating that B.J. was seventeen years old at the time of the
offense; that in 1983, B.J. was on juvenile probation for
burglary; that B.J. was charged repeatedly with theft in
1986; that B.J. was placed unsuccessfully in youth homes from
October 1986 through February 1988; that B.J. was expelled
from high school in 1987; and, that in January 1988, B.J. was

charged with intimidation and other minor offenses for which
he was adjudged delinquent by the Youth Court in March of
1988. McDougall further testified that B.J. was ordered to
pine Hills School for boys for a 45 day psychological
evaluation, which resulted in a negative report. McDougall
stated that in his opinion, B.J. would not be an appropriate
candidate for the Pine Hills School because he was too
advanced in age, his criminal record was too serious, and he
was too mature for the programs offered at the facility.

The deputy superintendent for program group living at
pine ~ills, Don Lee, also testified at the hearing. He
stated that given the serious nature of B.J.'s criminal
record, he would oppose B.J.'s placement in pine ills School
and, that the only institution suitable for placement of R.J.
would be the state prison.

Upon consideration of the testimony and the evidence
submitted, the court granted the State's motion to transfer
to District Court. B.J. argues that the motion was
improperly granted because it was not predicated on

substantial credible evidence. We disagree.

Section 41-5-206, MCA, sets forth, in part, the
requirements which must be met before a Youth Court case can
be transferred to District Court as follows:

(1) After a petition has been filed alleging
delinquency, the court may, upon motion of the
county attorney, before hearing the petition on its
merits, transfer the mztter of prosecution to the
district court if:

(a)(ii) the youth charged was 16 years of or more at the time of the conduct alleged to be unlawful and the unlawful act is . . .
(C)
aggravated or felony assault as defined in
45-5-202;


(D)
robbery as defined in 45-5-401;



(dl the court finds upon the hearing of all relevant evidence that there is probable -cause to believe that:
(i)
The youth committed the delinquent act
alleged;


(ii)
the seriousness of the offense and protection
of the communitv reauire treatment of the vouth
beyond that affordedA by juvenile facilities and



(iii) the alleged offense was committed in an agqressive, --or premeditated manner.
violent,
(Emphasisours.)

The statute also provides that the court may consider the
sophistication and maturity of the youth as well as his

record and previous history.

Here, the statutory requirements of 5 41-5-206, MCA, were met. B. J. is seventeen years old, is alleged to have committed both felony assault and robbery, and the court found that the evidence presented at B.J.'s hearing was
sufficient to establish probable cause as required under the
statute.

The court's findings of fact provided the following:

The seriousness of the offenses alleged and the
protection of the community require treatment of
the youth beyond that afforded by juvenile
facilities.

The finding was supported by the court's comments as
reflected in the transcript. The court stated that the
seriousness of the offenses were beyond treatment available
in juvenile facilities of the state and that the only
alternative to being placed in the state prison would be to

place B.J. on probation, which has proved to fail in the
past.

substantial credible evidence supported the court's findings. At the transfer hearing, testimony and evidence was presented. As previously noted, Holt, the robbery and assault victim, testified as to the events of December 6, 1988, and identified B.J. as one of the perpetrators; a. sheriff's detective testified as to his investigation of the crime in which weapons were found in the perpetrator's abandoned vehicle; the Sanders County sheriff testified as to the arrest of B.J. and his accomplices; the subsequent search of Holtls stolen vehicle revealed various weapons (the weapons were introduced as the State's evidence during the transfer hearing) ; the chief juvenile probation officer for Lake County testified as to B.J.Is criminal history and to the negative test results of B.J.'s psychological evaluation; and the deputy superintendent for program living at pine Hills testified that he would oppose B.J.'s placement at the facility. We hold that the testimony and evidence submitted during the transfer hearing was substantial and credible. The transfer of jurisdiction from Youth Court to District Court was proper.
Affirmed.

Download 5ea08cd2-775c-455b-aa1e-a88e43bf013b.pdf

Montana Law