Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » New Hampshire » Supreme Court » 1999 » 97-393, KEVIN COLLINS & a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER
97-393, KEVIN COLLINS & a. v. CITY OF MANCHESTER
State: New Hampshire
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 97-393
Case Date: 07/02/1999

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Clerk/Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, Supreme Court Building, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Opinions are available on the Internet by 9:00 a.m. on the morning of their release.

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

___________________________

Hillsborough-northern judicial district

No. 97-393

KEVIN COLLINS & a.

v.

CITY OF MANCHESTER

July 2, 1999

Hall, Hess, Kenison, Stewart, Murphy & Brown, P.A., of Manchester (Francis G. Murphy, Jr. on the brief and orally), for the plaintiffs.

McDonough & O'Shaughnessy, P.A., of Manchester (Robert J. Meagher on the brief and orally), for the defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHNSON, J. The plaintiffs, thirty-three police officers, appeal a decision of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) granting a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by the defendant, the City of Manchester (city). We reverse and remand.

The plaintiffs alleged the following facts. Each plaintiff entered into a "Three Year Training Agreement" (training agreement), which each plaintiff executed to join the city's police department. Each training agreement provided that the city would pay "a wage during and subsequent to training as specified in [a city employee pay scale]," including step increases. The city refused to pay these step increases after the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the city and the police union expired on June 30, 1994. The plaintiffs contend that expiration of the CBA does not affect the city's obligation to pay the wage increase as provided under the training agreement. The plaintiffs filed suit in superior court, alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and violation of 42 U.S.C.

New Hampshire Law

New Hampshire State Laws
New Hampshire Tax
New Hampshire Court
New Hampshire Labor Laws
New Hampshire Agencies

Comments

Tips