Preview:

a4388-05.opn.html

Original Wordprocessor Version This case can also be found at *CITE_PENDING*. (NOTE: The status of this decision is unpublished.)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-4388-05T54388-05T5 BARBARA MANNING, now known as BARBARA CARROLL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOHN MANNING, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________________________________________________ Argued telephonically March 27, 2007 Decided April 11, 2007 Before Judges Graves and Lihotz. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County, Docket No. FM-02-6706-93. Jennifer S. DeSimone argued the cause for appellant (Smith & Doran, attorneys, Ms. DeSimone, on the brief). George B. Wolfe argued the cause for respondent. PER CURIAM The parties were divorced in 1994. They have three daughters: Melissa is twenty-three years old, Amy is twenty-one, and Samantha is nineteen. Defendant John Manning appeals from companion orders entered on March 17, 2006, denying his motion for discovery and a plenary hearing, and granting plaintiff's motion

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/Opinions/a4388-05.opn.html[4/20/2013 4:53:53 PM]

a4388-05.opn.html

requiring him to pay one-half of the children's college expenses, including the sum of $39,615.82 for monies "already expended," and (2) the sum of $12,034.53 representing one-half of unreimbursed medical expenses allegedly incurred on behalf of parties' children during an eleven-year period from 1994 through 2004. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The trial court did not state its reasons for denying defendant's request for discovery and a hearing to consider the factors set forth in Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529, 545 (1982). And the court's statement of reasons for granting plaintiff's motion was limited to the following: RIDER TO ORDER (FINDINGS OF FACT)

Download a4388-05.opn.pdf

New Jersey Law