SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
                            APPELLATE DIVISION
                            DOCKET NO. A-7229-97T2

DENNIS WITT and LYNN WITT,
Individually and as members
of MAYWOOD PROPERTY OWNERS
Association,

    Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BOROUGH OF MAYWOOD,

    Defendant-Respondent,

and

COMMERCE BANK,

    Defendant/Intervenor-Respondent.

___________________________________________________________________

        Submitted January 25, 2000 - Decided February 10, 2000

        Before Judges Pressler, Landau and Ciancia.

        On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, whose opinion is reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (Law Div. 2000).

        Segreto & Segreto, attorneys for appellants (James V. Segreto, of counsel and on the brief).

        Rupp & Ten Hoeve, attorneys for respondent Borough of Maywood (William F. Rupp, on the brief).

        DeCotiis, FitzPatrick & Gluck, attorneys for respondent Commerce Bank (James A. Farber, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

    Plaintiffs Dennis Witt and Lynn Witt, individually and as members of Maywood Property Owners Association appeal from paragraphs one and two of a final judgment dated June 30, 1998 that dismissed with prejudice the consolidated complaints in Witt v. Borough of Maywood, Docket No. L-7444-96 and Witt v. Borough of Maywood, Docket No. L-2481-97. The dismissed complaints challenged the validity of a re-zoning ordinance and an exchange of easement ordinance adopted by the Borough.
    Upon review of the arguments raised on appeal, we affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Jonathan Harris in his comprehensive opinion reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (Law Div. 2000).