Preview:

a2978-05.opn.html

Original Wordprocessor Version
(NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished.) Original Wordprocessor Version

This case can also be found at *CITE_PENDING*. (NOTE: The status of this decision is unpublished.)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2978-05T22978-05T2 MAUREEN HUNTER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAVID SCHEINERT, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Submitted November 14, 2006 - Decided January 25, 2007 Before Judges Kestin and Lihotz. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Morris County, Docket No. FV-14-262-06. Pallarino & Bogan, attorneys for appellant (Michael R. Pallarino, of counsel and on the brief). Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito, Frost & Ironson, attorneys for respondent (Elizabeth M. Thomas, on the brief). PER CURIAM In this appeal, we address whether sending a series of email communications, over a two-month period, that do not contain threats to plaintiff's person or property, constitutes harassment, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4c, warranting the entry of a final restraining order (FRO) under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17 to -35 (PDVA). After review of the record and the arguments advanced by defendant on appeal, we affirm the entry of the FRO. The factual and procedural

Download a2978-05.opn.pdf

New Jersey Law