Preview:

a5595-07.opn.html

N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, and sentenced as a first offender to a seven-month suspension of his motor vehicle license, twelve hours at an Intoxicated Driver's Resource Center, and the statutorily mandated fine and fees. On a de novo appeal, the Law Division also found defendant guilty of this motor vehicle violation and reimposed the same sentence imposed by the municipal court. "> Original Wordprocessor Version

This case can also be found at *CITE_PENDING*.
(NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished.) NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5595-07T45595-07T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RYAN McCALL, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________________________________

Submitted June 30, 2009 - Decided Before Judges Skillman and Wefing. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Municipal Docket No. A-68-07. Carmen A. Malignaggi, attorney for appellant. Sean F. Dalton, Gloucester County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Joseph H. Enos, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief). PER CURIAM Defendant was found guilty in the Logan Township Municipal Court of driving while under the influence of alcohol, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, and sentenced as a first offender to a seven-month suspension of his motor vehicle license, twelve hours at an Intoxicated Driver's Resource Center, and the statutorily mandated fine and fees. On a de novo appeal, the Law Division also found defendant guilty of this motor vehicle violation and reimposed the same sentence imposed by the municipal court.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/Opinions/a5595-07.opn.html[4/20/2013 8:03:55 PM]

a5595-07.opn.html

On appeal, defendant presents the following arguments: POINT I: THE GLOVE BOX DEFENSE WAS IMPROPERLY REJECTED BY THE TRIAL COURT. POINT II: STATE V. DEFRANCISCO REQUIRES A NOT GUILTY FINDING. We reject these arguments and affirm defendant's conviction substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Geiger's oral opinion of June 25, 2008. The judge's factual findings regarding defendant's operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol are supported by sufficient credible evidence. See State v. Locurto, 157 N.J. 463, 470-71 (1999). Defendant's arguments do not warrant any discussion in addition to the factual findings and legal conclusions set forth in Judge Geiger's opinion. Affirmed.

(continued) (continued) 2 A-5595-07T4 July 24, 2009 0x01 graphic

This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law - Camden.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/Opinions/a5595-07.opn.html[4/20/2013 8:03:55 PM]



Download a5595-07.opn.pdf

New Jersey Law