Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » New Mexico » Court of Appeals » 2012 » Peoples Bank v. Taos Investment
Peoples Bank v. Taos Investment
State: New Mexico
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 31270
Case Date: 02/07/2012
Plaintiff: Peoples Bank
Defendant: Taos Investment
Preview:This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports.  Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.  Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 PEOPLES BANK,
3

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee,
4

v. NO. 31,270
5 TAOS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC,
6 LOTA REALTY, INC., DAVID H. BUCK and
7 JUDITH D. BUCK,

8 Defendants/Counterplaintiffs-Appellants,
9 v. 10 SCOTT MCADAMS, 11
Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, 12 and 13 PEOPLES BANK, 14
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee,
15 v.
16 ANGEL FIRE DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, 17 a New Mexico Limited Liability Company, 18 DAVID H. BUCK and JUDITH D. BUCK, and 19 PARKER EXCAVATING, INC.,
20 Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants,
1 v.
2 SCOTT MCADAMS,
3

Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
4 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY
5 John M. Paternoster, District Judge
6 Law Office of George Dave Giddens, P.C.

7 George Dave Giddens
8 Albuquerque, NM

9 for Appellees 10 Chris Key 11 Albuquerque, NM
12 for Appellants
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION 14 VANZI, Judge. 15
Defendants appeal from the partial summary judgment order filed by the district 16
court. We proposed to dismiss the appeal in a calendar notice, and we have received 17 a memorandum in opposition and a memorandum in support in response to our notice. 18 We have duly considered the arguments of the parties, but we find them unpersuasive. 19 We dismiss. 20
Plaintiff filed collection and foreclosure actions.  Defendants responded with 21
counterclaims and affirmative defenses.  Partial summary judgment was granted on
the majority of the counterclaims and third-party claims, basically leaving the
foreclosure actions and two counterclaims, along with the affirmative defenses, to be litigated. Defendants asked that the partial summary judgment order be certified as final under Rule 1-054 NMRA.  The district court held a hearing at which the court decided to dismiss the remaining counterclaims pursuant to Plaintiff
Download CA31270.pdf

New Mexico Law

New Mexico State Laws
New Mexico Tax
New Mexico Labor Laws
New Mexico Agencies
    > New Mexico DMV

Comments

Tips