Preview:

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3

Plaintiff-Appellee,
4

v. No. 31,393 5 DANIEL BRISENO, 6
Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY
8 Mark T. Sanchez, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General

10 William Lazar, Assistant Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM
12 for Appellee 13 Bennett J. Baur, Acting Chief Public Defender 14 Allison H. Jaramillo, Assistant Appellate Defender 15 Santa Fe, NM
16 for Appellant 17
MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant Daniel Briseno appeals his conviction for shoplifting (over $500)
and raises five issues on appeal.  We will address each issue in turn.  Based on the facts and arguments presented to the district court, we find no error.  Accordingly, we affirm.  


Fundamental Error and Jury Instruction Defining

Download CA31393.pdf

New Mexico Law