Preview:

[*1]


Decided on February 17, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and McCABE, JJ 2005-475 N C.
Leon I. Behar, P.C., Respondent,
against
Gail Slotnick, Defendant, -and - MAURICE LIPSCHIK, Appellant.
Appeal from an amended judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Vito M. DeStefano, J.), entered October 25, 2004. The amended judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $500, plus attorney's fees in the amount of $750, as against defendant Maurice Lipschik.
Amended judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this commercial claims action brought by plaintiff law firm to recover the balance due for legal services rendered to defendants in a landlord/tenant matter, plus attorney's fees in accordance with the retainer agreement, we are satisfied that the record supports plaintiff's recovery against defendant, and that "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/NY/2/2006_50249.htm[4/21/2013 5:00:36 PM] Leon I. Behar, P.C. v Slotnick (2006 NY Slip Op 50249(U))
and principles of substantive law" (UDCA 1807-A [a]).
Notwithstanding that the amended judgment was entered upon defendant's default, inasmuch as defendant sought to review the court's award of $500, a matter which was "the subject of contest below," the amended judgment was reviewable (see CPLR 5511; James v Powell, 19 NY2d 249, 256 [1969]).
Decision Date: February 17, 2006
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/NY/2/2006_50249.htm[4/21/2013 5:00:36 PM]

Download 2006_50249.pdf

New York Law