Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » New York » Civ Ct City NY, Kings County » 2013 » Satchell v Nickelson
Satchell v Nickelson
State: New York
Court: New York Northern District Court
Docket No: 2013 NY Slip Op 23032
Case Date: 01/31/2013
Plaintiff: Satchell
Defendant: Nickelson
Preview:Satchell v Nickelson (2013 NY Slip Op 23032)

Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, January 31, 2013
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn, for respondent. Suzanne Drysdale, Brooklyn, for petitioner.
{**39 Misc 3d at 218} OPINION OF THE COURT
Gary F. Marton, J.
Respondent alleges that petitioner illegally locked her out of her apartment. She moves to be
restored to possession and for an award of money damages. The motion is denied.
Background [*2]
Initially, this was a proceeding for nonpayment of rent. However, by a two-attorney stipulation the parties agreed to convert the lawsuit to a holdover. The stipulation, which was "so ordered" by the court, provided that respondent would vacate by October 11, 2012 and that petitioner would waive all rent arrears and use and occupancy.
Respondent did not move out by the deadline. Petitioner had a marshal's notice of eviction served. The parties moved and cross-moved for relief. By a decision and order dated December 19, 2012 the court (Fitzpatrick, J.) stayed execution of the warrant through December 31, 2012.
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/NY/1/2013_23032.htm[4/21/2013 1:06:37 PM] Satchell v Nickelson (2013 NY Slip Op 23032)
Now respondent alleges that petitioner illegally evicted her by changing the locks to the premises on January 23, 2013. She moves to be restored to possession and for treble damages pursuant to RPAPL 853.
Discussion
Respondent was not evicted by a marshal pursuant to a judgment or an order. Accordingly, she may not be restored to possession by a motion made in a proceeding commenced by petitioner. Instead, she must commence her own proceeding. As the court held in Ric-Mar Equity Ventures v Murrell (184 Misc 2d 298, 299 [App Term, 2d Dept 2000]):{**39 Misc 3d at 219}
"In a summary proceeding commenced by a landlord, the authority of the Civil Court to restore a tenant to possession is an incident of its power to vacate its own judgments and orders (CPLR 5015 [d]; 5523; Haebler v Myers, 132 NY 363; Iltit Assocs. v Sterner, 63 AD2d 600). Where, as here, the tenant is not removed pursuant to a judgment or order of the court, the court is without authority to direct the landlord to restore the tenant to possession (Tsafatinos v Jimenez, NYLJ, Feb. 9, 1999, at 32, col 2 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]). The tenant's remedy in these circumstances is to commence a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10) to be restored."
Respondent contends that to deny relief here on this ground exalts form over substance. However, a motion
"cannot be deemed a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10). The mandate of CPLR 103 (c) that a proceeding brought in an improper form not be dismissed but be allowed to proceed in a proper form is applicable only where the 'court has obtained jurisdiction over the parties' (Matter of Lipinski v County of Broome, 175 AD2d 369). Here, a notice of petition was not served upon landlord, and jurisdiction over it was not obtained (see, Kreindler v Irving Trust Co., 60 Misc 2d 441; see generally, 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac
Download 2013_23032.pdf

New York Law

New York State Laws
New York State
    > New York City Zip Code
New York Court
    > New York Courts
New York State Tax
    > New York State Tax Forms
New York Agencies
    > New York DMV

Comments

Tips