Preview:

Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U) June 6, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 115967/2010 Judge: Judith J. Gische Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search E-Courts (http://www.nycourts.gov/ecourts) for any additional information on this case. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

[* 1]
t

SCANNED ON 6181201 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY
DP E C EhlT

-

HON. 4UDITf-l J. GISCHE

PART

i0

P,

Index Number : 115967/2010 SCHINDLER, RANDY
vs

INDEX NO.
MOTION DATE MOTION $Ea. NO.
MOTION CAL. NO.

@&

LESTER SCHWAB KATZ & DWYER
Sequence Number : 001
DISMISS COMPLAINT

The following papers, numbered 1 to

were read on this motion to/for
PAPERS NUMBERED

Notlce of Motion/ Order to Show Cause - Affidavits - Exhibits Answering Affidavits - Exhibits Replying Affidavit8

...

Cross-Motion:  A y e s
J

0 NO

Upon the foregoing papers, It is ordered that this motion

FILED
RllOflON I DECIDED IN ACCORDANS
L THE ACCOMPANYINGMEMORANDUM NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

FILED
JUN 08 2011
NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Dated:

/
Check one: &NnL
Check if appropriate:

DiSPOSiTiON

N O k a d A L D~SPOS~T~ON

0 DO NOT POST

0 REFERENCE

0 SUBMIT ORDER/ JUDG.

n SETTLE ORDER/ JUDG.

[* 2]

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF

NEW YORK: IAS PART 10
DECISION/ ORDER

Randy Schindler, Plaintiff (s),
-against-

Index No.: Seq. No.:

603007109 001

PRESENT: Hon. Judith J. Gische J.S.C.

Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP and Jonathan A. Murphy, Esq.

FILED
3UN 08 2011

Recitation, as required by CPLR 5 2219 [a] of the papers consi&w&MWe review of COUNTY CLERK`S OFFICE this (these) motion(s): Numbered Papers Defs' n/m (321 I [a][5]) SBG affirm, exhs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Pltfs x/m (compel) w/DSC affirm, exhs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Defs' opp and reply w/SBG affirm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.-

Upon the foregoing papers, the decision and order of the court is as follonls:
This is an action for attorney malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty and violations of Judiciary Law

Download 2011_31519.pdf

New York Law