Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » New York » Appellate Term 1st Dept » 2013 » Simry Realty Corp. v Ondrias
Simry Realty Corp. v Ondrias
State: New York
Court: New York Northern District Court
Docket No: 2013 NY Slip Op 50150(U)
Case Date: 02/01/2013
Plaintiff: Simry Realty Corp.
Defendant: Ondrias
Preview:Simry Realty Corp. v Ondrias (2013 NY Slip Op 50150(U))
[*1]


Decided on February 1, 2013
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Torres, JJ 570512/12.
Simry Realty Corp., Petitioner-Appellant,
against
Dematra Ondrias, Respondent -Respondent.
Petitioner appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (David J. Kaplan, J.), dated October 17, 2011, which denied, as moot, its motion to strike respondent's answer and granted respondent's cross motion to dismiss the petition in a holdover summary proceeding.
Per Curiam.
Order (David J. Kaplan, J.), dated October 17, 2011, reversed, with $10 costs, respondent's cross motion denied, and petition reinstated.
This licensee holdover proceeding, in defense of which respondent Ondrias claimed the right to succeed to the rent controlled tenancy of her deceased mother, should not have been summarily dismissed. The single, postpetition correspondence sent by petitioner - written in response to "illegal
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/NY/1/2013_50150.htm[4/21/2013 1:08:08 PM] Simry Realty Corp. v Ondrias (2013 NY Slip Op 50150(U))
renovations" allegedly undertaken by respondent in the apartment premises - cannot be read so broadly as to constitute a formal acknowledgment of any tenancy rights on the part of respondent or to somehow vitiate the previously served notice to quit or resolve the disputed occupancy issues actively litigated herein. The creation of a landlord-tenant relationship "only arises from a legitimate manifestation of intent on the part of the parties to create such a relationship" (Coleman v Dabrowski, 163 Misc 2d 763, 765 [1994]), and should not be reduced to a matter of gamesmanship, seduction and artifice (id.).
In reinstating the holdover petition, we do not pass upon petitioner's motions to strike respondent's answer and for other relief, which were denied below as moot. Our disposition is without prejudice to petitioner's right, if so advised, to renew its applications for such relief in Civil Court.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: February 01, 2013
file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/NY/1/2013_50150.htm[4/21/2013 1:08:08 PM]

Download 2013_50150.pdf

New York Law

New York State Laws
New York State
    > New York City Zip Code
New York Court
    > New York Courts
New York State Tax
    > New York State Tax Forms
New York Agencies
    > New York DMV

Comments

Tips