Bjarko v. StateNos. 20100070 & 20100071

Per Curiam.

[¶1] James Arnold Bjarko appealed from a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. The district court rejected Bjarko's claims that three different attorneys in three separate stages of criminal proceedings provided Bjarko ineffective assistance of counsel, concluding all three attorneys provided him with reasonable professional assistance in the respective stages of the proceedings and he failed to show how the results of those proceedings would have been different but for any of the attorneys' claimed errors. Bjarko argues the district court erred in deciding he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner