Cermak v. CermakCivil No. 950067

Per Curiam.

Loretta Cermak appeals from that portion of a judgment entered by the District Court for Burleigh County awarding a retirement fund and savings bonds to Duane Cermak. Duane cross-appeals from that portion of the judgment awarding Loretta permanent spousal support. We affirm pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P. Schmidkunz v. Schmidkunz, 529 N.W.2d 857, 860 (N.D. 1995) (stating the trial court must make an equitable, not necessarily equal, distribution of the parties' real and personal property); Heley v. Heley, 506 N.W.2d 715, 720 (N.D. 1993) (stating spousal support may be required indefinitely to maintain a spouse who cannot be adequately restored to independent economic status).

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Beryl J. Levine
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom