City of Bismarck v. Perusquia
State: North Dakota
Docket No: 20060048
Case Date: 10/17/2006
City of Bismarck v. PerusquiaNo. 20060048
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Martin Perusquia appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. He argues the City of Bismarck did not present sufficient evidence to convict him. The record contains sufficient evidence to support the conviction; therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
North Dakota Law
North Dakota State Laws
North Dakota Tax
Comments
Tips