City of West Fargo v. OlsonNo. 20060325

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Rick Olson appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for driving under the influence of alcohol. Olson did not clearly articulate his issues on appeal. Further, Olson failed to file an appendix and a transcript, leaving us with very little record to review. "If the record on appeal does not allow a meaningful and intelligent review of the alleged error, we decline to review it." State v. Stockert, 2004 ND 146, ¶ 13, 684 N.W.2d 605; accord Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-Riemers, 2003 ND 70, ¶ 8, 660 N.W.2d 558; Wagner v. Squibb, 2003 ND 18, ¶ 5, 656 N.W.2d 674; Sabot v. Fargo Women's Health Org., Inc., 500 N.W.2d 889, 892 (N.D. 1993). We conclude Olson failed to provide us the opportunity to review his claims in a meaningful and intelligent manner. Therefore, we summarily affirm the district court under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom