Hintz v. Hintz
State: North Dakota
Docket No: 960332
Case Date: 05/13/1997
Hintz v. HintzCivil No. 960332
Per Curiam.
[¶1] In this divorce action, the plaintiff appeals the award of custody and the allocation of costs. The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. The trial court did not abuse its discretion. Although not all of the justices agreed with the decision, Krank v. Krank, 529 N.W.2d 844 (N.D. 1995) is controlling precedent correctly applied by the trial court. The judgment is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7).[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
North Dakota Law
North Dakota State Laws
North Dakota Tax
Comments
Tips