Interest of E.S.No. 20050246 Per Curiam.

[¶1] L.S. appeals from a juvenile court order adopting a juvenile referee's findings and order terminating her parental rights to E.S. and I.K. L.S. argues the juvenile court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence exists to support a finding of deprivation that was likely to continue and that the children would likely suffer harm absent a termination of parental rights. L.S. also argues the trial court erred because E.S.'s best interests would have been better served by a guardianship arrangement rather than a termination of parental rights and because reasonable efforts were not made to prevent removal of the children and to reunify the family once the children were removed.

[¶2] The juvenile court's order is not based on findings of fact that are clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner