Koropatnicki v. StateNo. 20080235 Per Curiam.

[¶1] Freeman Koropatnicki appealed from an order denying his amended application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Koropatnicki argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, on his previous appeal, and in his post-conviction proceedings; that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; that he was denied due process of law and fundamental fairness; and that the trial judge was biased against him. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom