Krall v. StateNos. 20050211-20050213
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Dawn Krall appeals from an order denying her applications for post-conviction relief and her motions for default judgment. The district court determined Krall was not entitled to a default judgment and failed to prove her claims for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). Bell v. State, 1998 ND 35, 575 N.W.2d 211.
[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring