Matter of J.M.No. 20100398
Per Curiam.
[¶1] J.M. appeals from a trial court order denying his petition for discharge and continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the State did not prove by clear and convincing evidence he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior and remains a sexually dangerous individual. We conclude the trial court did not clearly err in denying J.M.'s petition for discharge and affirm the trial court's order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner