Olsson v. Workforce Safety and InsuranceNo. 20060371

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Darlene Olsson appeals from a district court judgment affirming the decision of Workforce Safety and Insurance ("WSI") to deny her claim for benefits. WSI dismissed Olsson's claim on the grounds that she had not proven her employment activity was more than a trigger to her chronic, pre-existing degenerative disc condition and spondylosis of the spine. WSI concluded Olsson had not proven she sustained a compensable injury arising out of and in the course of her employment. We "exercise restraint in deciding whether the agency's findings of fact are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and we do not make independent findings or substitute our judgment for that of the agency." Barnes v. Workforce Safety & Ins., 2003 ND 141, ¶ 9, 668 N.W.2d 290. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom