R.R. v. G.H.No. 20040139

Per Curiam.

[¶1] G.H. appeals from a third amended paternity judgment granting R.R. visitation with his child for a seven-day period each month and holding each parent responsible for his or her own visitation transportation costs. The district court found longer, but less frequent, periods of visitation were in the best interest of the child due to the long travel time between the parties' homes. The district court found holding each parent responsible for his or her own transportation costs was an equitable allocation of the expenses. The district court further found G.H.'s subpoena was not issued in accordance with N.D.R.Civ.P. 45, and R.R. did not have to produce the requested information or answer related questions at trial.

[¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring