Stadheim v. StadheimNo. 20060193

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Polly Ann Stadheim appeals the trial court's amended divorce judgment, arguing the trial court erred in valuing and distributing the marital estate, and in failing to award her spousal support. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Polly Ann Stadheim also appeals the trial court's failure to restore her maiden name. The parties have stipulated to the restoration of her maiden name. The trial court is directed to modify the amended divorce judgment to restore Polly Ann Stadheim to her maiden name of Markegard.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner