State v. AlexanderNo. 20060363

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Sir Phillip Charles Alexander appeals the criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of unlawful entry into a vehicle. Alexander argues the evidence used against him was illegally obtained because the search warrant was not supported by probable cause. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict. We also affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(7), concluding Alexander's objection to the search warrant cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. State v. Zahn, 2007 ND 2, ¶ 6, 725 N.W.2d 894.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom