State v. KalinaCriminal No. 950265
Per Curiam.
Jason T. Kalina appeals from his conviction, through his conditional guilty plea, for driving under the influence of alcohol. Kalina argues his criminal conviction constituted double jeopardy under the state and federal constitutions because his driving privileges had already been suspended in an administrative hearing under NDCC ch. 39-20. We affirm under NDRAppP 35.1(a)(7). See State v. Zimmerman, 539 N.W.2d 49 (N.D. 1995).
Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
Beryl J. Levine
William A. Neumann