State v. MarsetteNo. 20110285
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Raunlyn Marsette appeals from a district court judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence. On appeal, Marsette argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion for the stop of Marsette's vehicle. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring