State v. MendezNo. 20110273

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Carlos Mendez Jr. appealed from a district court criminal judgment entered after the district court revoked his probation. On appeal, Mendez argues there is insufficient evidence to support the revocation of his probation. Specifically, Mendez asserts the district court did not take judicial notice of his two criminal convictions, and the allegation that he violated the terms of his probation by using alcohol was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner