State v. Rath Criminal No. 930053
Per Curiam.
Roddy Rath appealed from a district court order revoking probation and from the amended judgment of conviction for the felony offense of theft of property.
The finding of probation violations was not clearly erroneous; and the revocation of probation, and the amendment of judgment were not an abuse of discretion. See Rule 32(f)(2)(iii), N.D.R.Crim.P.; State v. Orseth, 359 N.W.2d 852 (N.D. 1984).
The order and amended judgment are affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(2) and (4), N.D.R.App.P.
Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke
Beryl J. Levine
William A. Neumann