Stoller v. Stoller Civil No. 930019

Per Curiam.

Donald Stoller appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court for Stutsman County in a divorce action between him and Patricia Stoller. He alleges that the award of spousal support to Patricia was clearly erroneous, and that the distribution of property and debts was inequitable. We have previously considered the issues raised by Donald, and are convinced that such authority is dispositive of his appeal. See, e.g., Pfliger v. Pfliger, 461 N.W.2d 432 (N.D. 1990); Martin v. Martin, 450 N.W.2d 768 (N.D. 1990); Hecker v. Hecker, 448 N.W.2d 207 (N.D. 1989). See also Culver v. Culver, 497 N.W.2d 431 (N.D. Ct. App. 1993). Therefore, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(2) and (7), N.D.R.App.P.

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Beryl J. Levine
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke