T.S., et al. v. J.L.

Civil No. 960151

Per Curiam.

J.L. appeals the district court's judgment delineating his child support obligation. Specifically, J.L. argues the district court erred by finding no existing stipulation in the child support obligations; by ordering child support payments in arrears based on J.L.'s 1992 and 1994 income; and by giving insufficient weight to J.L.'s temporary employment situation and indefinite plan to return to school in determining his future child support obligation. We affirm the district court's judgment under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
Mary Muehlen Maring