Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Cincinnati

State: Ohio

Docket No: 2003-Ohio-5089

Case Date: 09/26/2003

Plaintiff: Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Defendant: Cincinnati

Preview:[Cite as Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Cincinnati, 154 Ohio App.3d 504, 2003-Ohio-5089.]

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, Appellant v. CITY FO CINCINNATI, Defendant/Third-Party Appellee; The State of Ohio, Third-Party Appellant. [Cite as Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Cincinnati, 154 Ohio App.3d 504, 2003-Ohio5089.] Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County. No. C-020747 and C-020761. Decided Sept. 26, 2003. __________________ Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, Mark A. Vander Laan and Timothy S. Mangan, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Diane M. Weaver, Assistant Attorney General, for third-party appellant state of Ohio. Julia L. McNeil, City Solicitor, and Richard Ganulin, Assistant City Solicitor, for third-party appellee city of Cincinnati. Furnier & Thomas, LLP, and Rasheed A. Simmons, for amicus curiae Bond Hill Community Council and Bond Hill Community Urban Redevelopment Corporation. __________________ Per Curiam.

OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

{

Download 2003-ohio-5089.pdf