State v. Ysrael

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Ohio » 1st District Court of Appeals » 2013 » State v. Ysrael

State v. Ysrael

State: Ohio

Court: Ohio Southern District Court

Docket No: 2013-Ohio-1125

Case Date: 03/27/2013

Plaintiff: State

Defendant: Ysrael

Preview:[Cite as State v. Ysrael, 2013-Ohio-1125.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO,                                                                 :   APPEAL NOS. C-100622
                                                                                   C-120263
Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                            :   TRIAL NO. B-0905094
vs.                                                                            :   O P I N I O N.
ELIJAH YSRAEL,                                                                 :
Defendant-Appellant.                                                           :
Criminal Appeal From:  Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas
Judgment Appealed From Is:  Reversed and Cause Remanded
Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal:  March 27, 2013
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee,
Christine Y. Jones, for Defendant-Appellant.
Please note:  this case has been removed from the accelerated calendar.

DINKELACKER, Judge.
{¶1}    Defendant-appellant Elijah Ysrael appeals the judgment of the trial
court imposing court costs without notifying him that he could perform community
service in lieu of paying court costs.   For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial
court’s judgment.
{¶2}                                                                                         In  August                                                                    2010,  the  trial  court  found  Elijah  Ysrael  guilty  of
trafficking and possession of cocaine, and sentenced him to four years in prison.   In
November 2011, this court affirmed the trial court’s judgment, but remanded the
cause for the limited purpose of imposing a mandatory fine.   After the imposition of
that fine, Ysrael again appealed.  This court allowed Ysrael to reopen his 2010 appeal,
and consolidated it with his second appeal.   The initial appeal was reopened to allow
counsel to present argument on whether the trial court properly informed Ysrael he
could perform community service in lieu of paying court costs.
Community Service in Lieu of Court Costs
{¶3}                                                                                         Ysrael’s assignment of error asserts that the trial court erred to his
prejudice by failing to notify him of the possibility that the court could order community
service in lieu of paying his court costs.   Under R.C. 2947.23(A)(1), if a court imposes
court costs on a defendant as part of the judgment, the court must notify the defendant
that he can perform community service in lieu of payment.
{¶4}                                                                                         If a trial court fails to notify the defendant of the possibility of court-
ordered community service in lieu of paying costs, as required by R.C. 2947.23 (A)(1),
the proper remedy is to vacate the imposition of costs and remand the case for proper
community-service notification.   See State v. Dillard, 1st Dist. No. C-120058, 2012-
Ohio-4018, ¶ 8, citing State v. Smith, 131 Ohio St.3d 297, 2012-Ohio-781, 964 N.E.2d
423.
2

{¶5}                                                                                            The trial court imposed court costs on Ysrael, but failed to notify him of
the  possibility  of  community  service,  as  required  by  R.C.  2947.23(A)(1).    Ysrael’s
assignment of error is sustained, and we remand the matter to the trial court to properly
notify Ysrael of the possibility of community service, as required by R.C. 2947.23(A)(1).
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
CUNNINGHAM, P.J., and FISCHER, J., concur.
Please note:
The court has recorded its own entry on the date of the release of this opinion.
3

Download c-100622.pdf