A123045 Proctor and Proctor

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Oregon » 2006 » A123045 Proctor and Proctor

State: Oregon

Docket No: 15-02-23725;A123045

Case Date: 02/08/2006

FILED: February 8, 2006

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of the Marriage of

JOHN M. PROCTOR,

Respondent,

and

JOYCE A. SMITH PROCTOR,

Appellant.

JOYCE A. SMITH PROCTOR,

Appellant,

JOHN KENDALL MAVIS,

Respondent,

and

CHRIS POPOV,
SANDRA MEYERS, and WILLIAM MARTELL MEYERS,

Third-Party Respondents below.

15-02-23725; A123045

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.

Maurice K. Merten, Judge.

On appellant's petition for reconsideration filed January 10, 2006, and respondent's response to appellant's petition for reconsideration filed January 13, 2006. Opinion filed December 28, 2005. 203 Or App 499, 125 P3d 801.

Mark Johnson and Johnson Renshaw & Lechman-Su PC for petition.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., and Greene & Markley, P.C. for response for respondent John M. Proctor.

Russell Lipetzky waived appearance for respondent Kendall Mavis.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified, ruling on wife's request for attorney fees vacated; opinion otherwise adhered to.

PER CURIAM

Wife has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in this dissolution case, contending that we erred in affirming the trial court ruling that had denied her an award of attorney fees. She contends that we should have vacated the attorney fee decision on appeal in light of our decision to reverse and remand for reconsideration of the property award in the case. We agree with wife. We therefore modify our opinion by deleting the discussion of wife's third assignment of error and replacing it with the following:

"In her third assignment of error, wife contends that the trial court erred in denying her request for attorney fees. In light of our decision to reverse and remand the property division for reconsideration, we vacate the trial court's decision on attorney fees and remand for reconsideration of that issue as well. See Garza and Garza, 201 Or App 318, 330, 118 P3d 824 (2005)."

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified, ruling on wife's request for attorney fees vacated; opinion otherwise adhered to.

Preview:FILED: July 13, 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUSTIN DEWAIN DALBY, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 090748295 A143586

Edward J. Jones, Judge. Submitted on June 08, 2011. Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Morgen E. Daniels, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Tiffany Keast, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Brewer, Chief Judge, and Gillette, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. State v. Rainoldi, 236 Or App 129, 235 P3d 710 (2010), rev allowed, 349 Or 654 (2011).

Download A143586 State v. Dalby.pdf