Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Oregon » 2009 » S057884 Day et al v. Kroger (Ballot Title Certified)
S057884 Day et al v. Kroger (Ballot Title Certified)
State: Oregon
Docket No: none
Case Date: 12/09/2009

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS


BALLOT TITLE CERTIFIED

December 9, 2009

Berman v. Kroger (S057802). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 54 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Berman v. Kroger (S057883). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 57 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Caruthers v. Kroger (S057687); Day et al v. Kroger (S057693). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 47 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057763). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 49 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057773). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 50 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057804); Syrett et al v. Kroger (S057814). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 51 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Day et al v. Kroger (S057884). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 58 2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Download S058778 In re Lawrence.pdf

Oregon Law

Oregon State Laws
Oregon Tax
Oregon Court
    > Muller v. Oregon
Oregon Labor Laws
Oregon Agencies
    > DMV Oregon

Comments

Tips