Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Oregon » 2000 » S47309 Sizemore v. Myers (S47309)
S47309 Sizemore v. Myers (S47309)
State: Oregon
Docket No: none
Case Date: 04/06/2000

Filed: April 6, 2000

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

BILL SIZEMORE,

Petitioner,

v.

HARDY MYERS,
Attorney General for the State of Oregon,

Respondent.

(SC S47309)

En Banc

On petition to review ballot title.

Submitted on the petition, the answering memorandum of respondent, and the record March 8, 2000.

Gregory W. Byrne, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner.

Brendan C. Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the answering memorandum for respondent. With him on the memorandum were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

PER CURIAM

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(10).

PER CURIAM

This is a ballot title review proceeding brought under ORS 250.085(2). Petitioner is an elector who timely submitted written comments to the Secretary of State respecting the content of the draft ballot title for a proposed measure designated by the Secretary of State as Initiative Petition 136 (2000). He therefore is entitled to seek review of the resulting ballot title for that measure certified by the Attorney General. See ORS 250.085(2) (setting that requirement). We review the Attorney General's certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035 (1997). (1) See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out standard of review).

We have considered each of petitioner's arguments concerning the ballot title certified by the Attorney General. We conclude that none establishes that the Attorney General's certified ballot title fails to comply substantially with the standards for such ballot titles set out in ORS 250.035(2)(a) to (d) (1997). Accordingly, we certify to the Secretary of State the following ballot title:

AMENDS CONSTITUTION: PROHIBITS SPECIFIED LAWS REGULATING DIRECT DEPOSIT, PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS, RELATED NEGOTIATIONS

RESULT OF "YES" VOTE: "Yes" vote prohibits specified laws, rules regulating availability of direct deposit, payroll deductions, related negotiations.

RESULT OF "NO" VOTE: "No" vote rejects prohibiting specified laws and rules regulating direct deposit, payroll deductions, related negotiations.

SUMMARY: Amends Constitution. Constitution now prohibits laws restricting employees' right to make political contributions through electronic transfers, payroll deduction. Measure entitles employers, employees, unions to negotiate direct deposit, automatic payroll deductions to pay bills, make contributions, conduct other financial transactions. Prohibits certain laws restricting those negotiations, restricting or mandating: type of employer providing, employees using direct deposit, payroll deduction; type of persons, entities receiving funds through those means; timing, frequency of employees' decisions authorizing those services; purposes for using those services. Does not require those services.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(10).

1. The 1999 Legislature amended ORS 250.035(2) in several respects. Or Laws 1999, ch 793,

Download S058778 In re Lawrence.pdf

Oregon Law

Oregon State Laws
Oregon Tax
Oregon Court
    > Muller v. Oregon
Oregon Labor Laws
Oregon Agencies
    > DMV Oregon

Comments

Tips