Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Oregon » 2001 » S48864 Sizemore/Novick v. Myers (Certification)
S48864 Sizemore/Novick v. Myers (Certification)
State: Oregon
Docket No: none
Case Date: 11/26/2001

FILED: NOVEMBER 26, 2001

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

BILL SIZEMORE,

Petitioner,

v.

HARDY MYERS,
Attorney General,

Respondent.

STEVEN NOVICK
and TIMOTHY J. NESBITT,

Petitioners,

v.

HARDY MYERS,
Attorney General,

Respondent.

(SC S48864, S48873)
(Consolidated for Opinion)

En Banc

On modified ballot title filed November 16, 2001.

No appearance by petitioners.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, filed the filing of modified ballot title for respondent. With her on the filing were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

The modified ballot title is certified. The appellate judgment shall issue in accordance with ORS 250.085(9).

*332 Or 648, ___ P3d ___ (2001) (referring ballot title for modification).

The court in this ballot title review proceeding determined that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure, which the Secretary of State denominated as Initiative Petition 96 (2002), failed to comply substantially with statutory standards. Sizemore/Novick v. Myers, 332 Or 648, ___ P3d ___ (2001). Under Oregon Laws 2001, chapter 802, section 2 (now codified as ORS 250.085(8)), the court referred the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification. The Attorney General has filed a modified ballot title for the proposed initiative measure, and no party to the ballot title review proceeding has objected. See ORS 250.085(9) (setting out period within which party may object to modified ballot title and requiring court to certify modified ballot title if no objection filed).

The modified ballot title for Initiative Petition 96 (2002) states:

"ALLOWS INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM SIGNERS TO
PREVENT SALE OF THEIR PETITION SIGNATURES;
CREATES IMPLEMENTING, ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS

"RESULT OF 'YES' VOTE: 'Yes' vote allows signers to prevent sale, barter, exchange of their signatures on initiative, referendum petitions; creates implementing, enforcement provisions; requires minimum fine for violation.

"RESULT OF 'NO' VOTE: 'No' votes rejects creation of statutory right allowing signers to prevent the sale, barter or exchange of their signatures on initiative or referendum petitions.

"SUMMARY: Allows signers to prevent their signatures on initiative, referendum petitions from being sold, bartered or exchanged for anything of value. Secretary of State shall not approve any petition for circulation unless petition clearly indicates signer's right not to have signature sold, bartered, exchanged, and gives signers opportunity to make that choice. If signer refuses permission, no person or entity may directly or indirectly pay for obtaining that signature or transmitting it to Secretary. Requires minimum $250 fine per occurrence; each unlawful sale of signature is separate occurrence. Does not prohibit payment for signature gathering by hour or on salary where amount of payment is not determined directly or indirectly by number of signers who have chosen not to have signatures sold, bartered, exchanged."

The modified ballot title is certified. The appellate judgment shall issue in accordance with ORS 250.085(9).

Oregon Law

Oregon State Laws
Oregon Tax
Oregon Court
    > Muller v. Oregon
Oregon Labor Laws
Oregon Agencies
    > DMV Oregon

Comments

Tips