Preview:

COLE v. COLLINS et al

Doc. 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAWN COLE, Petitioner, v. ROBERT COLLINS, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3839

O R D E R AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2011, upon a de novo review1 of Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart's Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 7) and Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (doc. no. 8) that the Court will construe as objections, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 7) is ADOPTED and APPROVED to the extent consistent with this Order; 2. Petitioner's Objections (doc. no. 7) are

Section 636 of Title 28 of the U.S. Code governs the jurisdiction, power, and temporary assignments of United States Magistrate Judges. Subsection (b)(1) provides: A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C.

Download 35725.pdf

Pennsylvania Law