Preview:

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Gail G. Marshall, v. State Employees' Retirement System, Respondent : : : : : : :

Petitioner

No. 464 C.D. 2005 Argued: September 15, 2005

BEFORE:

HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, Judge HONORABLE ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge HONORABLE JOSEPH F. McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge

OPINION BY JUDGE LEADBETTER

FILED: November 23, 2005

Gail Marshall appeals from an order of the State Employees' Retirement Board (Board) denying her claim, premised upon an Approved Domestic Relations order (ADRO), to fifty-percent of her ex-husband's State Employees' Retirement System (SERS) Option 4 lump sum withdrawal.1 SERS denied the claim because it had permitted the assignment of the entire lump sum
An ADRO "authorizes the attachment of a SERS member's retirement benefits for purposes of equitable distribution under the Divorce Code, 23 Pa. C.S.

Download 464cd05-11-23-05.pdf

Pennsylvania Law