Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Pennsylvania » District Court » 2009 » GORDON et al v. EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP et al
GORDON et al v. EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP et al
State: Pennsylvania
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Docket No: 2:2008cv04682
Case Date: 01/14/2009
Plaintiff: GORDON et al
Defendant: EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP et al
Preview:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARCIA GORDON and ROBERT CORCORAN, Plaintiffs, vs. EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP, JUDGE HOWARD F. RILEY, JR., Individually and in Official Capacity as Chester County (PA) Common Pleas Court Judge, and MARGARET M. YOKEMICK, Individually and in Official Capacity as Chester County (PA) Common Pleas Court Administrator, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-4682

DuBOIS, J.

JANUARY 13, 2009

MEMORANDUM I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order (Document No. 2, filed September 29, 2008); Response of Defendant East Goshen Township to Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Request for a Permanent Injunction (Document No. 9, filed October 29, 2008); and Judicial Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order/Request for a Permanent Injunction and Judicial Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Document Nos. 12 and 13, filed November 14, 2008). Additional briefing from the parties is also before the Court: Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law on Rooker-Feldman Jurisdiction and Pullman Abstention (Document No. 16, filed December 2, 2008); and Defendant East Goshen

Township's Response to Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law on the Applicability of RookerFeldman Jurisdiction and Pullman Abstention Doctrines (Document No. 19, filed December 10, 2008). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Judicial Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint on the ground that the case is moot, and thus this Court lacks jurisdiction. Pursuant to the doctrine announced in Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Company, 312 U.S. 496 (1941), the Court abstains from adjudicating plaintiffs' claims against defendant East Goshen Township and defendant East Goshen Township's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Request for a Permanent Injunction. In view of these rulings, Plaintiffs' Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order is denied as moot. II. BACKGROUND On August 4, 2008, the Board of Supervisors of East Goshen Township, located in Chester County, Pennsylvania, enacted Resolution 08-50 ("Resolution"), which adopted and implemented the East Goshen Township Open Space Deer Hunt Reduction Initiative ("Initiative") dated July 19, 2008. East Goshen Twp., Pa., Resolution 08-50 (Aug. 4, 2008). The Initiative's goal is "to return the deer population size in the township to its 1995 level within 10 years" by allowing regulated bow hunting of deer in certain Township open spaces. East Goshen Township Open Space Deer Hunt Reduction Initiative 4
Download 41216.pdf

Pennsylvania Law

Pennsylvania State Laws
Pennsylvania Tax
Pennsylvania Labor Laws
Pennsylvania State
Pennsylvania Agencies
    > Pennsylvania Secretary of State

Comments

Tips