KENT v. SARVER

State: Pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court

Docket No: 2:2011cv02690

Case Date: 02/14/2012

Plaintiff: KENT

Defendant: SARVER

Preview:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARILYN KENT,  :
  Plaintiff, :
   :
v.  : Civ. No. 11-2690
   :
JAY SARVER,  :
  Defendant. :
   :

DECISION

After I dismissed Plaintiff.s earlier pro se pleadings for want of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. Nos. 7, 28), Plaintiff filed a pro se Third Amended Complaint on January 20, 2012.  (Doc. No. 33.)  She has also filed a smatter of pro se Motions and other papers that are largely incomprehensible.  (Doc. Nos. 29, 30, 32, 35, 36.)  Defendant has filed a Motion to Strike one of Plaintiff.s incomprehensible filings, and a Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint.  (Doc. Nos. 31, 34.)
As in her previous pleadings, Plaintiff alleges in the Third Amended Complaint that she rented property from Defendant, who, she appears to claim, is liable for sexual assault, battery, breach of contract, injury to her horses, and slander.  Plaintiff again appears to invoke 18 U.S.C.

Download 32211.pdf