Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » South Carolina » District Court » 2010 » Bobby Brockington and Robert Jolly vs Wachovia et al
Bobby Brockington and Robert Jolly vs Wachovia et al
State: South Carolina
Court: South Carolina District Court
Docket No: 4:2008cv02324
Case Date: 01/26/2010
Plaintiff: Bobby Brockington and Robert Jolly
Defendant: Wachovia et al
Preview:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Bobby Brockington and Robert Jolly,                                                                   )                                  C.A. No. 4:08-2324-TLW-TER
)
Plaintiff,                                                                                            )
                                                                                                      )
vs.                                                                                                   )                                  ORDER
                                                                                                      )
Wachovia Bank, N.A., as trustee for the                                                               )
registered holders Aegis Asset Backed                                                                 )
Securities Trust Mortgage Pass-Through                                                                )
Certificates Series 2005-5, Ocwen Loan                                                                )
Servicing, LLC, a/k/a Ocwen Federal Bank;  )
Korn Law Firm; Seals Law Firm, P.A.,                                                                  )
Premier Properties, and others as they                                                                )
become known,                                                                                         )
)
Defendants.                                                                                           )
____________________________________)
This matter is now before the undersigned for review of the Report and Recommendation
(“the Report”) filed by United States Magistrate Thomas E. Rogers, III, to whom this case had
previously been assigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.).  In
his Report, Magistrate Judge Rogers recommends that plaintiffs’claims against defendants Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC, a/ka Ocwen Federal Bank and the Korn Law Firm be dismissed pursuant to
Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that this case be dismissed in its entirety as all
other defendants have previously been dismissed.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate
Judge’s Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in
whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report.                                       28 U.S.C. § 636.   No objections
1




have been filed to the Report.  In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge,  this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the
recommendation.  See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4 tCir. 1983).  h
A review of the record indicates that the Report accurately summarizes this case and the
applicable law.  For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED  that
the Magistrate Judge’s Report is ACCEPTED (Doc. # 62),  and plaintiffs’claims against defendants
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, a/ka Ocwen Federal Bank and the Korn Law Firm are DISMISSED
pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  Additionally, this case is DISMISSED
in its entirety as all other defendants have previously been dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Terry L. Wooten
TERRY L. WOOTEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
January 26, 2010
Florence, South Carolina
2





Download 27880.pdf

South Carolina Law

South Carolina State Law
South Carolina Tax
South Carolina Labor Laws
South Carolina Agencies

Comments

Tips