Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Robert Steve Jolly,                                                                                   )
)
Plaintiff,                                                                                            )
                                                                                                      )
vs.                                                                                                   )   Civil Action No. 1:10-1159-TLW-SVH
                                                                                                      )
                                                                                                      )
Phillip Thompson, Tom Fox, Nurse Hipp,                                                                )
Officer Updegraff, Major Johnson, Nurse                                                               )
Connie, and Cpt. Stafford,                                                                            )
)
Defendants.                                                                                           )
___________________________________  )
ORDER
Robert Steve Jolly, (“plaintiff”), brought this civil action, pro se, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983 on May 10, 2010. (Doc. # 1).
This matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation
(“the Report”) filed by United States Magistrate Shiva V. Hodges, to whom this case had
previously been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the plaintiff’s
motions for a temporary restraining order be denied. (Doc. # 65). The plaintiff filed no objections
to the Report.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate
Judge=s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. '
636. In the absence of objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required
to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198,
199 (4th Cir. 1983).




The  Court  has  carefully  reviewed  the  Magistrate  Judge=s  Report.  For  the  reasons
articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge=s Report
and Recommendation is ACCEPTED.                                                                (Doc. # 65). Therefore, the motions for a temporary
restraining order are DENIED. (Docs. # 16 and 36). Similarly, the request for a hearing is
DENIED. (Doc. # 36).
IT IS SO ORDERED
____s/Terry L. Wooten____
United States District Judge
February 28, 2011
Florence, South Carolina
2

Download 25348.pdf

South Carolina Law