Preview:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
October 1, 2003 Session CITY OF COOKEVILLE, TN by and through COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MED. CTR. v. WILLIAM M. HUMPHREY, M.D., ET AL.
Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Putnam County No. 99-219 Billy Joe White, Chancellor

No. M2001-00695-SC-R11-CV - Filed February 20, 2004

In this declaratory judgment action, the plaintiff, a private act hospital authority established pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated sections 7-57-601 to -604, seeks a declaration that it has the authority to enter into an exclusive contract for professional imaging services. The defendants, four radiologists who currently have clinical privileges at the Imaging Department of a hospital operated by the plaintiff, filed a counterclaim. We affirm the judgments of the lower courts, holding that Tennessee Code Annotated section 7-57-603 permits the hospital authority to enter into an exclusive provider contract, that the Board of Trustee's decision to close the staff of the Imaging Department did not violate the medical staff bylaws, and that the defendants are not legally or constitutionally entitled to a hearing if their clinical privileges are terminated upon the entry of an exclusive provider contract. Tenn. R. App. P. 11 Appeal by Permission; Judgment of the Court of Appeals Affirmed JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which FRANK F. DROWOTA , III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON , ADOLPHO A. BIRCH , JR., and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined. William H. West, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellants, Daniel F. Coonce, M.D., William M. Humphrey, M.D., John P. Limbacher, M.D., George O. Mead, M.D., and Putnam Radiology, P.C. Andr

Download Cookeville.pdf

Tennessee Law