Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Tennessee » Court of Criminal Appeals » 1996 » In April 1989. In The Present Appeal, The Petitioner, Relying In Part Upon State v. Roger
In April 1989. In The Present Appeal, The Petitioner, Relying In Part Upon State v. Roger
State: Tennessee
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 02C01-9610-CC-00333
Case Date: 10/21/1996
Plaintiff: In April 1989. In The Present Appeal, The Petitioner, Relying In Part Upon State
Defendant: Roger
Preview:IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON

BILLY JOE HARRIS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF TENNESSEE, Respondent.

) ) ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9610-CC-00333 ) ) LAKE COUNTY ) ) No. 96-7519 ) Feb. 24, 1997 ) Cecil Crowson, Jr.

FILED
Appellate Court Clerk

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the state's motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The case before this Court represents an appeal from the trial court's denial of the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. The record was filed on October 3, 1996, and the petitioner filed his brief on October 21, 1996. The petitioner was originally indicted for aggravated sexual battery in February 1989, and was convicted of the same in April 1989. In the present appeal, the petitioner, relying in part upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App. June 20, 1996), contends the judgment entered against him is void because the indictment failed to allege the mens rea of the offense charged.

Having reviewed the state's motion in light of the petitioner's response and the entire record on appeal, we conclude that the motion is well-taken and should be granted. The trial judge dismissed the petitioner's petition stating that "[a]llegations concerning the sufficiency of the indictment are not the proper subject of habeas corpus relief." It is well established that challenges to the sufficiency of an indictment cannot be tested in a habeas corpus proceeding. See Haggard v. State, 475 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1971); Brown v. State, 445 S.W.2d 669, 674 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1969). A panel of this Court recently held the same in a capital case. Barber v. State, No. 01C01-9408-CR-00281 (Tenn. Crim. App., Feb. 23, 1995).

Nonetheless, we have considered the substance of the petitioner's claim and determine it to be without merit. Hill represents a direct appeal from a case involving an indictment rendered subsequent to the 1989 revisions to the Criminal Code. Conversely, the appeal in the present case stems from a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus and involves an indictment issued prior to the 1989 changes in the Code. The opinion in Hill was based upon this Court's interpretation of T.C.A.
Download harr-bi1ord.pdf

Tennessee Law

Tennessee State Laws
Tennessee Tax
Tennessee Labor Laws

Comments

Tips