Preview:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON
June 19, 2008 Session META-SUE JONES WOODALL v. JETHERO JACKSON WOODALL, JR.
Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-002673-02 Rita L. Stotts, Judge

No. W2007-01880-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 20, 2008

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed; and Remanded DAVID R. FARMER , J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W.S., and HOLLY M. KIRBY , J., joined. Daniel Loyd Taylor and John N. Bean, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jethero Jackson Woodall, Jr. Mitchell D. Moskovitz and Adam N. Cohen, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellee, Meta-Sue Jones Woodall. MEMORANDUM OPINION1 This appeal arises from a divorce action. The issues presented on appeal relate to the trial court's classification and division of the parties' property. We affirm. Meta-Sue Jones Woodall ("Wife") and Jethero Jackson Woodall, Jr. ("Husband") were married in 1968. At the time of the marriage, Husband was forty years of age and Wife was thirtyfour years of age. It was the third marriage for both. No children were born of the marriage. Wife
1

Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee provides:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. W hen a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated "MEMORANDUM O PINION", shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.

filed a complaint for divorce in May 2002. The parties stipulated that sufficient grounds existed for divorce, and in May 2004 the trial court entered a final decree of divorce declaring the parties divorced pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated

Download WoodallMetaSueJonesOPN.pdf

Tennessee Law