$10,000.00 in United States Currency v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 220th District Court of Bosque County

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 10th District Court of Appeals » 2008 » $10,000.00 in United States Currency v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 220th District Court of Bosque County

State: Texas

Court: Texas Northern District Court

Docket No: 10-08-00263-CV

Case Date: 10/01/2008

Plaintiff: Anna Jeffries

Defendant: Pat A. Madison, Inc. and Denis Papasan (Allied National, Inc. and Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Co

Preview:Ronald Ducote v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court of Jefferson County
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-07-020 CV ____________________ RONALD DUCOTE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 3983 (85161) MEMORANDUM OPINION Ronald Ducote, d/b/a Butch's Bail Bond Service, appealed the final judgment forfeiting a bond after entry of judgment nisi. (1) The appeal was submitted without briefs because the appellant failed to file his brief by June 8, 2007, the due date for filing a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On August 16, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.9. We also notified the parties that the Court would consider whether damages should be imposed. See Tex. R. App. P. 45. The appellant has appealed a bond forfeiture on seven other occasions. See Ducote v. State, No. 09-06-138 CV, 2007 WL 117718 (Tex. App.--Beaumont Jan. 18, 2007, no pet.)(mem. op.); Ducote v. State, Nos. 09-06-016 CV & 09-06017 CV, 2006 WL 1682192 (Tex. App.--Beaumont Jun. 15, 2006, no pet.)(mem. op.); Ducote v. State, No. 07-03-440 CV, 2003 WL 22849808 (Tex. App.--Amarillo Dec. 2, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.); Ducote v. State, Nos. 09-03-035 CV, 09-03-042 CV & 09-03 056 CV, 2003 WL 21946896 (Tex. App.--Beaumont Aug. 14, 2003, no pet.)(mem. op.). Ducote failed to file a brief in any of these appeals. In this case, a substantial delay occurred in processing the notice of appeal. Although Ducote once again failed to file a brief, he did not contribute to the delay in processing the appeal. Although the appellant's pattern of filing notice of appeal but not filing a brief suggests the appeal has not been brought in good faith but was brought for purposes of delay or harassment, in this appeal, because of the delay in processing his notice of appeal, it would not be appropriate to award damages for filing a frivolous appeal. In the absence of a brief assigning error, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). APPEAL DISMISSED.

__________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on September 6, 2007 Opinion Delivered September 27, 2007

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/9169.html[8/20/2013 7:31:06 PM]

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ. 1. Bond principal Andre Paul Espree did not file notice of appeal.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/9169.html[8/20/2013 7:31:06 PM]

Download 9169.pdf