Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Texas » 14th District Court of Appeals » 2006 » All Play, Inc. v. Stonewear, Inc.--Appeal from 125th District Court of Harris County
All Play, Inc. v. Stonewear, Inc.--Appeal from 125th District Court of Harris County
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Docket No: 14-06-00194-CV
Case Date: 11/30/2006
Plaintiff: All Play, Inc.
Defendant: Stonewear, Inc.--Appeal from 125th District Court of Harris County
Preview:In re Robert D. Sheppard, M.D. & Emcard, Inc.-Appeal from 151st District Court of Harris County
MAJORITY | MAJORITY /**/ In The Court of Appeals For the First District of Texas ____________

NO. 01-05-00375-CV NO. 01-05-00449-CV ____________

IN RE ROBERT D. SHEPPARD, M.D. AND EMCARE, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petitions for Writ of Mandamus or for Writ of Prohibition

CONCURRING OPINIONI agree with the majority decision to deny relators petitions, but would deny the petition for a writ of mandamus because relators have not demonstrated a clear right to relief. Well-settled principles demand that a relator who seeks relief in an original proceeding demonstrate a clear right to the action that the relator seeks to compel or to foreclose. See Tilton v. Marshall, 925 S.W.2d 672, 682 (Tex. 1996); Stoner v. Massey, 586 S.W.2d 843, 846 (Tex. 1979). To warrant the relief requested by writ of mandamus here, relators must conclusively establish that the trial court had an unequivocal and ministerial duty to surrender jurisdiction either because it was undisputed that Ochoa never expected to serve Cooper, see Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn, 363 S.W.2d 230, 232 (Tex. 1962), or because of lack of demonstrated intent by Ochoa to serve Cooper. See M.O. Dental Lab. v. Rape, 139 S.W.3d 671, 674 (Tex. 2004). Because relators have not conclusively established either contention, I would deny their petition for a writ of mandamus.

Sherry Radack Chief Justice

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/82849.html[8/20/2013 8:41:25 PM]

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Alcala.

Chief Justice Radack, concurring.

file:///C|/Users/Peter/Desktop/opinions/PDFs1/82849.html[8/20/2013 8:41:25 PM]

Download 82849.pdf

Texas Law

Texas State Laws
    > Hazelwood Act
    > Texas Statutes
Texas State
    > Texas Cities
    > Texas State
    > Texas Zip Codes
Texas Tax
    > Texas Franchise Tax
    > Texas Sales Tax
    > Texas State Tax
Texas Court
    > Texas Public Records
Texas Labor Laws
    > Minimum Wage in Texas
Texas Agencies
    > Texas DMV
    > Texas Medicaid

Comments

Tips